From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10381: 24.0.92; delete-other-windows-vertically depends on the window split order Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:34:43 +0100 Message-ID: <4EFB6143.9000700@gmx.at> References: <87pqf9d7la.fsf@gnu.org> <4EFAE65F.1020305@gmx.at> <8762h0bn6d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325097330 21823 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2011 18:35:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10381@debbugs.gnu.org To: sds@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 28 19:35:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyLU-0007W8-7S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 19:35:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58858 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyLT-0005U5-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:35:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58269) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyLQ-0005PX-3n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:35:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyLN-00025V-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:35:19 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyLN-00025G-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyO2-00054V-C0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10381.132509745419449 (code B ref 10381); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2011 18:37:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyNa-00053e-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:37:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RfyNX-00053V-KR for 10381@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:37:32 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2011 18:34:44 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-52-13.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.52.13]) [62.47.52.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 28 Dec 2011 19:34:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19hBDp089xhmH8AaTPYSiMPuoCMdQbezG8egPXY8J Q5UUJycL5ELZsr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <8762h0bn6d.fsf@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:38:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55257 Archived-At: > Because in this case delete-other-windows-vertically deletes windows > horizontally. Really? > I would have understood if the function did _nothing_, but deleting > windows horizontally is clearly wrong. If you want the function to do nothing in that case, you would have to tell it do nothing. `window-combined-p' can help here. >> Delete the windows in the same column with WINDOW, but not WINDOW itself. >> >> That sentence is vague but doesn't contradict what the function does. > > this makes for a very unintuitive notion of a column. You probably should use the term "edge" instead of "column". Then you would see that the function indeed deletes every window whose corresponding edge has the same coordinate value as that of WINDOW. >> Then you will probably >> understand that the behavior you apparently strive for cannot be >> obtained when the first split of a frame's root window creates windows >> one above the other. > > this is very unfortunate. ... but deeply rooted in the way Emacs splits windows ever since. martin