all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window
@ 2011-12-03  3:11 Chong Yidong
  2011-12-03  3:55 ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2011-12-03  3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 10200

With latest trunk:

emacs -Q
C-x m

The *unsent mail* buffer pops up in a different window.

This is a regression from the behavior in previous version of Emacs, and
it is caused by

  revno: 106557
  committer: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
  branch nick: trunk
  timestamp: Wed 2011-11-30 09:52:08 -0500
  message:
  * lisp/gnus/message.el (message-pop-to-buffer): Revert 2011-09-11 change.

What is the rationale for this change?

In GNU Emacs 24.0.92.3 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.2.0)
 of 2011-12-03 on furball





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window
  2011-12-03  3:11 bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window Chong Yidong
@ 2011-12-03  3:55 ` Stefan Monnier
  2011-12-03 15:44   ` Drew Adams
  2011-12-04  1:48   ` Chong Yidong
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-12-03  3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chong Yidong; +Cc: 10200

> With latest trunk:
> emacs -Q
> C-x m

> The *unsent mail* buffer pops up in a different window.

> This is a regression from the behavior in previous version of Emacs, and
> it is caused by

I reverted the code to what it was in Emacs-23 (i.e. calling
pop-to-buffer), so the difference must be elsewhere.

> What is the rationale for this change?

The reason for the reversion was that the new code (using
switch-to-buffer) ignored special-display-*.  Maybe it should call
pop-to-buffer-same-window?


        Stefan





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window
  2011-12-03  3:55 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-12-03 15:44   ` Drew Adams
  2011-12-04  1:48   ` Chong Yidong
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2011-12-03 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Stefan Monnier', 'Chong Yidong'; +Cc: 10200

> > What is the rationale for this change?
> 
> The reason for the reversion was that the new code (using
> switch-to-buffer) ignored special-display-*.  Maybe it should call
> pop-to-buffer-same-window?

See bug #9532.






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window
  2011-12-03  3:55 ` Stefan Monnier
  2011-12-03 15:44   ` Drew Adams
@ 2011-12-04  1:48   ` Chong Yidong
  2011-12-04 10:40     ` martin rudalics
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2011-12-04  1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: 10200

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> I reverted the code to what it was in Emacs-23 (i.e. calling
> pop-to-buffer), so the difference must be elsewhere.
>
>> What is the rationale for this change?
>
> The reason for the reversion was that the new code (using
> switch-to-buffer) ignored special-display-*.  Maybe it should call
> pop-to-buffer-same-window?

In Emacs 23, message-mode relied on same-window-buffer-names to remain
on the same window.  That's nil, now so you can't just call
pop-to-buffer there.  I've checked in a fix.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window
  2011-12-04  1:48   ` Chong Yidong
@ 2011-12-04 10:40     ` martin rudalics
  2011-12-04 15:16       ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: martin rudalics @ 2011-12-04 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chong Yidong; +Cc: 10200

 > In Emacs 23, message-mode relied on same-window-buffer-names to remain
 > on the same window.  That's nil, now so you can't just call
 > pop-to-buffer there.  I've checked in a fix.

IMHO all former same-window-buffer-names/-regexps guarded calls of
`display-buffer' should use `pop-to-buffer-same-window' now.

martin





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window
  2011-12-04 10:40     ` martin rudalics
@ 2011-12-04 15:16       ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-12-04 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: martin rudalics; +Cc: Chong Yidong, 10200

>> In Emacs 23, message-mode relied on same-window-buffer-names to remain
>> on the same window.  That's nil, now so you can't just call
>> pop-to-buffer there.  I've checked in a fix.
> IMHO all former same-window-buffer-names/-regexps guarded calls of
> `display-buffer' should use `pop-to-buffer-same-window' now.

Yes, the proper replacement is pop-to-buffer-same-window, indeed.
But since we want to preserve backward compatibility with such code, we
don't *have* to replace them right away.


        Stefan





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-04 15:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-03  3:11 bug#10200: 24.0.92; Message buffer pops up in new window Chong Yidong
2011-12-03  3:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-03 15:44   ` Drew Adams
2011-12-04  1:48   ` Chong Yidong
2011-12-04 10:40     ` martin rudalics
2011-12-04 15:16       ` Stefan Monnier

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.