From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: window-next-buffers Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:55:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4ECF9E42.1010701@gmx.at> References: <878vn67y0l.fsf@gnu.org> <4ECE159F.8080300@gmx.at> <8739dduz0q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4ECF6AD1.1070807@gmx.at> <87zkfkqynp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322229331 8262 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2011 13:55:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 14:55:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwFN-0000Vt-BP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:55:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwFM-0003Ad-Uv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:55:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwFK-00039Q-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:55:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwFJ-000333-8P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:55:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:43095) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTwFI-00031G-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2011 13:55:14 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-49-172.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.49.172]) [62.47.49.172] by mail.gmx.net (mp058) with SMTP; 25 Nov 2011 14:55:14 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19B7qcaiYRBHqr5HaJO9ERAghfQQ2QoXswOtV4Pwb 9ZLmnz6Pt3Rg3/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87zkfkqynp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146226 Archived-At: > IIUC this means that a set of next-buffers is a subset of prev-buffers. Hopefully. > Sorry, I meant "a new buffer" (displayed in the selected window > by `set-window-buffer'). You mean that `set-window-buffer` should not throw away a window's next buffers? Let's reconsider this when we encounter a real problem with the present implementation. martin