From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: window-next-buffers Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:15:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4ECF6AD1.1070807@gmx.at> References: <878vn67y0l.fsf@gnu.org> <4ECE159F.8080300@gmx.at> <8739dduz0q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322216163 10117 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2011 10:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 11:15:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTsp2-0004OS-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:15:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTsp2-0007tJ-7A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:15:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTsoy-0007t2-VX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:15:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTsou-0000yK-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:48910) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTsou-0000xy-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:15:48 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2011 10:15:46 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-60-59.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.60.59]) [62.47.60.59] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 25 Nov 2011 11:15:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+mVogUWeam2kGLmJk7wxXNdKH1l+4hn4hcT0Lvcw M/dn2eVKtAMR7D User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <8739dduz0q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146211 Archived-At: > This sounds like an overly optimization. But actually I can't find > a case where `next-buffer' would fail to get information about markers. > Is this because information about markers of next buffers is retrieved > from `window-prev-buffers'? Yes. In `switch-to-next-buffer' (assq buffer (window-prev-buffers window)) provides this information. `window-next-buffers' is exclusively used for buffer navigation within a window. `window-prev-buffers' is used in other occasions like `quit-window' where I don't care about a window's next buffers. > Isn't better to push a new window to the top of the list of next buffers > to not lose information about the rest of next buffers? Can you elaborate what you mean here? A new window has neither previous nor next buffers. martin