From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows' "split status" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:34:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4EC4E323.7030304@gmx.at> References: <87vcqqoekt.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBD6B63.4050607@gmx.at> <87vcqq6utg.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBE4414.10009@gmx.at> <87d3cwr9hc.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFA0AF.7000608@gmx.at> <87obwgatpy.fsf@gnu.org> <4EBFFBA5.1000309@gmx.at> <87hb26gdx8.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC213EA.4080304@gmx.at> <871ut9n2rr.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC2820E.7010401@gmx.at> <87y5vhs04e.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87obwc7ixv.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3csdot8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321526076 13748 80.91.229.12 (17 Nov 2011 10:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 11:34:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQzId-0001Dq-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:34:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQzIc-0000Wf-Ss for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:34:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQzIa-0000Wa-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:34:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQzIZ-0006M4-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:34:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:36659) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQzIY-0006LQ-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 05:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2011 10:34:20 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-59-208.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.59.208]) [62.47.59.208] by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 17 Nov 2011 11:34:20 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Jd0Rx+xWJ2+kKoOJpQbpZEKSvwHDRIIZ/2s0hyF y8JonHboCM2tKM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87d3csdot8.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146072 Archived-At: > Also I think `window-splits' is a bad name too. It's vague > and provides no hint of its purpose. Would it be possible > to find a better name that mentions `combination'? Such as e.g. > `window-combination-resize' or `window-combination-balance'? The term "balance" would be misleading since `balance-windows' and `balance-windows-area' both try to give windows the same size which `window-splits' doesn't. It rather causes windows get resized proportionally. So I changed this to `window-combination-resize'. Thanks, martin