From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jean-Christophe Helary Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: killing the result of isearch Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:44:12 +0900 Message-ID: <4EA90B44-DF92-43C3-B8D0-6C42D1D6F1DA@gmail.com> References: <433bd3d0-a506-4d89-9d10-dcbfb0e23be0@default> <852BAA28-2A50-4AD9-B8D6-9F06905A4395@gmail.com> <87r2tava5x.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87y3nigy86.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87wp32f7os.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <29AEE45F-D0CA-442F-8F46-E290C40782B4@gmail.com> <87k1z02yth.fsf@fliptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510181094 16559 195.159.176.226 (8 Nov 2017 22:44:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:44:54 +0000 (UTC) To: Help Gnu Emacs mailing list Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 08 23:44:50 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCZ5T-0003ts-PG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:44:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34229 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCZ5W-0003Bw-GI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCZ53-0003Br-HM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:44:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCZ4z-000465-Fg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]:47814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCZ4y-00045w-Vr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o7so3077395pgc.4 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:44:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=CUTxxpvL3IBOzdiM7BvpLh7NOGj04uZNsxWwzWKynVc=; b=mzHs7LfA3asj6Bpdc0edJ+Wxpw9ONvruPNhyZcYUreuJ3e13BYoxnhTqZldjjw5Ipe 7to3E1VR+LP4VPtnMpBTLUKa38kuI5XVzg3ZERT4IVCOwp7fGLtnmKm42ijBsT2O+pp5 vr38/a6C3w8pmEiWANoryL6PZADHvL+GObnr8SCjiwgi9nTPzX1xbRf83zHe8YGB6Jr8 Ukpo8dVpbjFcO1dw0JDaP+mOUmEZlZUYHI2AKZWQ9hGl9nbWG9NdzUXb9Fmw0iQxZ5Wr tOVpKn5gAjwaZB1puvdLnGD4xio7H/De496FER55mQvdkogTzzUPn/Rt5h7xA5YhYGE3 Spwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=CUTxxpvL3IBOzdiM7BvpLh7NOGj04uZNsxWwzWKynVc=; b=Fs7SiWNS8pEhWNNmTG6FaUxo+S7EUD6h3qikrxucTra8V9zbha1PyqZ505NY5wy10R mySaAcekFd+q/QrnCtVntKbBV5DDYmUfIAR57tBs4L1sNDX2RwPDYq8uqBpzszn6Wb26 5TAOH2xH7S/jY45PfzV374xxm6SYb6CMaVo7gTH32PA2VX0kTYBNFjrqn2Xi30+b1pgv 2bxzS//L0T2j3jbXTIQKeXeLSWAFEIQH78g52npZXnISx5FzszlfbO/WocrDnV4zjW8U KRlxAHgn8v5ZWfB+bwonoXD0U3eNYelKvjj1LwUIyjTkJFBQsDZEd1B/aK0vIBss3yQ7 LStg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5ikYLvOEfirq5TTkj/v13y795yTAM3vF1h+Db2uJs+LsduMfD7 6X/wef3cnoHSMrIj4lHxwAu8xGxb X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Q70T3XvHWwjraRYvTCsAzUvSsGBbuP6N9YVwkvAjkWIMq/m1jFdc8vP5zd8MwJi3GpY5UAag== X-Received: by 10.99.115.4 with SMTP id o4mr1826950pgc.371.1510181055724; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:44:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.24.52] (pl27304.ag0304.nttpc.ne.jp. [128.53.17.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u76sm9942648pfk.181.2017.11.08.14.44.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:44:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k1z02yth.fsf@fliptop> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:114819 Archived-At: > On Nov 9, 2017, at 7:24, Tomas Nordin wrote: >=20 > Jean-Christophe Helary writes: >=20 >> No, I am actually talking about expectations from using emacs where = regions are highlighted, like what isearch seems like doing. What I am = seeing is what looks like a region (and except for the active match, all = the others are highlighted exactly as a region would be), but it doesn't = act like a region. So there is a UI promise that's broken. >=20 > Does this imply that in a read-only buffer, there must be no = highlighting of the match for you not to say the UI is broken? Read my text again, and read your question one more time. You probably = have the answer you need by now. > You cannot act on the text there. I can certainly M-w on any region I like. A region is a region, = regardless of the buffer state, afaiu. > Or, in a read-only buffer, is it good that the match(es) are = highlighted? Why? I may be thick, but it does look like you're trying to make me look like = a fool, when it is you who do not seem to properly understand the issue = I'm talking about. Do you actually have anything useful to add to the thread? Jean-Christophe Helary ----------------------------------------------- @brandelune http://mac4translators.blogspot.com