From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9724: 24.0.90; ido-mode does not kill completions buffers Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:52:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4E95393C.4050201@gmx.at> References: <86aa98i7oj.fsf@googlemail.com> <4E93B9C2.8050806@gmail.com> <0E00180BF13F4DBD86C0AB5896797819@us.oracle.com> <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318402433 5306 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2011 06:53:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9724@debbugs.gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 08:53:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDshI-00044k-0C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:53:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53295 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDshH-0006b7-JO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDshE-0006U3-An for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDshD-00008u-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDshD-00008o-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDshY-0007e3-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:54:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:54:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9724 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9724-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9724.131840239729286 (code B ref 9724); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:54:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9724) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2011 06:53:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDsgm-0007cJ-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDsgj-0007bv-Ae for 9724@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:53:14 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2011 06:52:45 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-62-98.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.62.98]) [62.47.62.98] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2011 08:52:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19XZ4hyAGxXPzCMxcx3dZTyeKoHuIIrq9xm6dJnxr AFW/toP06JkQkt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <4E94F14A.6090005@gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:54:04 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52567 Archived-At: >>> So, maybe this behavior is intentional. Is there any way to have the >>> completion buffers killed instead of buried? >> >> Sounds like bug #9639...? > > You are right. Thanks. The fix for bug#9639 doesn't change anything wrt whether the completion buffer gets killed or buried. martin