From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs? Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:23:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8E8CD1.8030305@online.de> References: <4E89124D.8070405@cs.ucla.edu> <4E895885.5060201@online.de> <87ehyu1qk7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4E89794F.8040706@online.de> <87zkheg8xc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874nzlsxwf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4E8E0AB4.1050900@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317965025 21464 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2011 05:23:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:23:45 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 07:23:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RC2uM-00046a-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:23:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC2uL-0007gC-HT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57320) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC2uI-0007g7-RC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:23:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC2uH-0001As-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:62562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RC2uH-00019E-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.27] (brln-4db9f027.pool.mediaWays.net [77.185.240.39]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M852L-1Qz4QI24aP-00wD4Q; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:23:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 SUSE/3.1.15 Thunderbird/3.1.15 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:yKJVooUdlHimAIif4WaJOGcEL/h6Fsz2UZFBATrZo4f 5OqIADaKZm3jVOT3ljL4srHX8Z6OfFfd4n037Mqd7raOTnnBQ2 up1hOLtesVjmbRQCwlwb1Jawoqq5qiX7nMZh/kh/K9fwQty0+U hwqPanKMiS1a31ZnkoS+BiL/RYGi9tVKh2q2bXS+0I8SX9cIKH V4YYcEwLPRpRoAy0G53l5PMCXrHIquQp7h9kT+2joRSTbTxJRR wBPvcKR304b2YJRE+mlZME3RjT12GRzGPagEnxmBSxhsie55w8 6SGANJJuM1uJkqqbcNq/1AOWCQNmafxgfaWiMafK2XkqahgjdU mU3GGxfJHgxN3TUXEs7Y3XD4exs7mLk/i2fMydtq4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 212.227.17.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144667 Archived-At: Am 06.10.2011 22:12, schrieb Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen: > Andreas Röhler writes: > >> for me transient-mark-mode in connection with a mark set is enough. > > Oh, are we having this discussion again? > > I, like (I'm assuming) all other oldey-timey Emacs users :-), disabled > `transient-mark-mode' the first chance I got. And the reason for that > is that `C-x C-x' activates the region, which makes it impossible to use > that command to jump around in buffers. don't understand. After C-x C-x just do a C-space to deactivate and jump previous marks as common. Cheers, Which I do constantly. > > If that rather odd overloading of the `C-x C-x' command went away, I > might start using `transient-mark-mode'. >