From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9639: 24.0.90; Problem with bury-buffer in minibuffer-hide-completions Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:51:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8B2B7A.8010504@gmx.at> References: <87hb3thebv.fsf@escher.home> <4E86D879.7060105@gmx.at> <87r52xkp0l.fsf@escher.home> <4E86F22B.5060007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317743508 835 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2011 15:51:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9639@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 17:51:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HR-0001pX-HC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:51:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HR-0003mv-42 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HL-0003dm-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HK-0005p1-F1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:35 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7HK-0005ou-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:51:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7Il-0001vl-GM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:53:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:53:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9639.13177435787400 (code B ref 9639); Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:53:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2011 15:52:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7If-0001vI-De for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RB7Ib-0001vA-Mt for 9639@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:52:55 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2011 15:51:22 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-57-203.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.57.203]) [62.47.57.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2011 17:51:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/pMcktIX3pnaRnN+lgHkAiIv1Xr5GHYzbjaQIi44 EmG57GYdqccZG+ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:53:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52164 Archived-At: > In Emacs-23, marking the window as dedicated via > display-buffer-mark-dedicated was handy but indeed had the disadvantage > of preventing the window's reuse by display-buffer. I think in Emacs-24 > this disadvantage is less serious because the completion code is a lot > more careful to not leave the *Completion* displayed too long. > So making display-buffer-mark-dedicated work (which we need to do in any > case) should be all that's needed to fix the bug. > > But of course, if we can get the *Completions* window/frame deleted > without marking it as dedicated, that'd be fine as well. I think both `quit-window' and `bury-buffer' should handle this the same way now. So if bug#7368 has not been resolved yet we should be able to display completions in a non-dedicated window and quit that afterwards. martin