From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9639: 24.0.90; Problem with bury-buffer in minibuffer-hide-completions Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:04:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4E874831.3060709@gmx.at> References: <87hb3thebv.fsf@escher.home> <4E86D879.7060105@gmx.at> <87r52xkp0l.fsf@escher.home> <4E86F22B.5060007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317488760 29958 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2011 17:06:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 17:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9639@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 01 19:05:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30c-0004e5-W4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:05:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30c-0004Go-DX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:05:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30a-0004Gh-3z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30Z-0005SV-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30Z-0005SR-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA31i-0002s0-Hg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:07:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9639.131748876710964 (code B ref 9639); Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2011 17:06:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30p-0002qm-1s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA30m-0002qe-TV for 9639@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Oct 2011 17:04:50 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-32-74.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.32.74]) [62.47.32.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2011 19:04:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18YqlkEOesYxrAOGSuLb2WWT05PtWpDwwY1oW99fK oImIP7G4gOTDaX User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:07:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52047 Archived-At: > BTW, can't we just use `quit-window'? This would delete a stand-alone frame and not iconify it. > But of course, if we can get the *Completions* window/frame deleted > without marking it as dedicated, that'd be fine as well. We could give `quit-window' a third argument telling it to iconify the frame instead of deleting it or add an option to deal with this case. Since I still intend to eventually replace window excursions by `display-buffer' + `quit-window' (which will probably take years) some general pattern would be useful anyway. martin