From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6FA09C.7000600@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871uvkcuvr.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
> I've fixed this directly in window-deletable-p.
Thanks. Apparently
(not (eq (next-frame nil 0) (selected-frame))))
which is in `bury-buffer' should do the same. Do you see any
differences?
>> Then I'll revert to the previous behavior which kills the frame even if it
>> has some buffer it could show instead.
>
> Note sure what you mean. Wouldn't that make the frame deletion even
> more aggressive?
Hopefully not. The drawback now is that with `pop-up-frames' non-nil
doing
C-h k RET
M-x prev-buffer
M-x next-buffer
q
will delete the frame although it could show the buffer shown by
`prev-buffer' instead.
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-10 19:14 Uhm... weird frame behaviour Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-10 22:13 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-11 9:34 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-11 15:27 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-11 15:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-12 9:04 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 9:04 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 12:22 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 12:47 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 13:32 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 14:55 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 15:34 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 16:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 17:16 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 17:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 18:26 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-13 11:59 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 19:17 ` Chong Yidong
2011-09-13 12:00 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-13 12:45 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-13 18:28 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-14 1:34 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-13 15:41 ` Chong Yidong
2011-09-13 18:27 ` martin rudalics [this message]
2011-09-13 19:09 ` Chong Yidong
2011-09-12 12:31 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 12:47 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 13:32 ` Andy Moreton
2011-09-12 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 16:52 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-13 18:28 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-13 20:26 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-10 23:40 ` Rasmus
2011-09-10 23:42 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-10 23:46 ` Rasmus
2011-09-10 23:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-11 0:05 ` Óscar Fuentes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E6FA09C.7000600@gmx.at \
--to=rudalics@gmx.at \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.