From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9461: 24.0.50; Weird behaviour in "show-parent-mode" Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:26:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4E69B1AF.6050003@gmx.at> References: <87pqjbq4zd.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87bouuu8tw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315549689 19860 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2011 06:28:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9461@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 09 08:28:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1uZI-0000Ns-Nm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:28:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59830 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1uZH-0006jc-Ux for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1uZE-0006jW-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1uZD-00034M-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R1uZD-00034I-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1ud7-0004Za-S4; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9461 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9461-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9461.131554987017520 (code B ref 9461); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9461) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2011 06:31:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1ucF-0004YV-PU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R1uc9-0004Y1-4J for 9461@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Sep 2011 06:26:56 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-51-64.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.51.64]) [62.47.51.64] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 09 Sep 2011 08:26:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18s5U1UTwkseenuflIXmDtnu9iGdS81qZpZgLAu+i 8VpRN7XQbD4rND User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87bouuu8tw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 02:32:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50733 Archived-At: > Perhaps nothing should be highlighted when syntax of the previous > character is `escape' `\'. IIUC the syntax of `\' is punctuation here, so there's no mismatch. Or am I missing something? martin