From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9406: 24.0.50; Use M-p/M-n to navigate through the kill ring Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:55:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4E5E3D6A.3050504@dogan.se> References: <87zkirnlug.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87ippfnl3g.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314799080 2220 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2011 13:58:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9406@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 31 15:57:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QylIg-0007Qy-9R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:57:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42705 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QylIf-0003M1-Su for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:57:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QylIc-0003Lw-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:57:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QylIb-0006ch-Pk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:57:50 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QylIb-0006cb-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:57:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QylLi-0003yt-7H; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Deniz Dogan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9406 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9406-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9406.131479923415181 (code B ref 9406); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9406) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2011 14:00:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QylLF-0003wU-OK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp04.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.153.5]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QylLA-0003tT-GN for 9406@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from c80-216-105-155.bredband.comhem.se ([80.216.105.155]:59220 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by ch-smtp04.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QylHX-0000n7-DY; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:56:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: 80.216.105.155 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1QylHX-0000n7-DY. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp04.sth.basefarm.net 1QylHX-0000n7-DY 8ae380fb157944eaebe1302741fcf17c X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 10:01:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50472 Archived-At: On 2011-08-31 15:01, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Actually one of the benefits of your proposal is that it opens up the > possibility of freeing the M-y binding. > Why "free" the M-y binding if it means jailing M-n and M-p? M-y does nothing useful unless preceded by C-y today, so in that sense it's already "free".