From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9273: 23.3; malloc initialization should (sometimes) happen at runtime Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:51:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4E45BC8E.7050104@gmx.de> References: <4E41940C.2010605@cornell.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313193164 16759 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2011 23:52:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9273@debbugs.gnu.org To: kbrown@cornell.edu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 13 01:52:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1Wp-0008Vi-DP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:52:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60671 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1Wp-0000lj-34 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1Wm-0000lP-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1Wl-0006MP-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1Wl-0006Kq-5t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1Y9-0005MM-QR; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4E41940C.2010605@cornell.edu> Resent-From: grischka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131319320320558 (code B ref -1); Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2011 23:53:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1XX-0005LX-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:53:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1XV-0005LR-PN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:53:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1W5-00065L-8Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:60558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1W5-00065H-78 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1W4-0000kT-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1W3-000651-7I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:46500) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qs1W2-00064v-OJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:51:51 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2011 23:51:48 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.65.63.233]) [82.113.106.41] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 13 Aug 2011 01:51:48 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18588216 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18TPe4ZgywTSd0/ngxYSZnVrv5vKZvbMmhArDPVje daJvIN8xDJmdHM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) Original-References: 4E451A1F.4060409@cornell.edu X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:54:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50038 Archived-At: > No. At the very least, I have to force reinitialization of malloc. > Otherwise the BLOCK macro yields wrong results that lead to infinite > looping or crashing. I don't think the results from the BLOCK macro are wrong. I think your analysis of the problem is wrong. ;) --- grischka