On 8/12/2011 8:48 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Thanks, but it doesn't seem to fix anything, just mess things up in a
>> somewhat different way.
> 
> It did fix the problem to some extent, but indeed it suffered from
> a "multiline" problem (partly inherited from the previous code).
> 
> I've installed the patch below which should fix the problem, tho it may
> introduce others.  Please try it out.

I haven't had a chance to try it yet, but the patch below is actually
pretty clever. I'll have to add its approach to my toolbox.