From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display-buffer-alist simplifications Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:10:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4E422ED1.2030607@gmx.at> References: <87mxgem09k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E22AE2B.5040806@gmx.at> <4E248102.6080904@gmx.at> <4E380918.3060806@gmx.at> <4E397611.5020603@gmx.at> <4E3C13D4.9000707@gmx.at> <4E3D4592.40809@gmx.at> <4E3FA875.6020905@gmx.at> <4E412E5E.6030204@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312960230 21190 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 07:10:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 09:10:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr2vp-00082S-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:10:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42115 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr2vo-0004TA-P5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr2vi-0004DX-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:10:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr2ve-0002dJ-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:10:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:36344) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr2ve-0002d4-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2011 07:10:13 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-53-1.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.53.1]) [62.47.53.1] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 10 Aug 2011 09:10:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1803BcjeLA09ByZvMSVs903uNkIx0INrEU4CEhB6w QujJU4N/mIxArg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143096 Archived-At: >> There's one thing that won't work for you: `bury-buffer' doesn't iconify >> the frame but deletes it. > > I'd hate that (at least as much as Drew hates iconification). Both, deletion+recreation and iconification/deiconification have their pros and cons. We should provide both. martin