Re: No sources for lisp/international/uni-*.el?

["Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@online.de>]

Am 09.08.2011 10:45, schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
>> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:21:09 +0200
>> From: Andreas Röhler<andreas.roehler@online.de>
>>
>>
>>> I apologize to the other list members for the tone in this mail.
>>>
>>
>> which pretty good illustrates my concern
>
> Tone aside, your repeated attacks on the GPL

Hi Eli,

even if my contributions are modest, it should be clear I'm a supporter 
of free software. BTW published several stuff under GPL. I'm far from 
attacking.

OTOH should I hide concern if envisaging danger, which might destroy the 
whole project still, if not faced?

The point is that some requirings of the GPL are de facto impossible to 
fulfil. Well, that impossibility only exists to a certain extend, but it 
grows with the project.

 From there seeing larger projects in constant danger being sued.

That's well known for long for people who cared for. Just we reached the 
point it might be brought to consideration to people pretty close to the 
GPL-authors. Sometimes we need real examples to understand...

Anyway, as said earlier, for me an accessible and working Emacs is the 
final proof of concept.

Thanks so far

Andreas



  are really off-topic
> here.  There are specialized forums for that kind of discussions.
>