Re: more than one prefix argument

["Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@online.de>]

Am 27.07.2011 11:25, schrieb Tim Cross:
[ ... ]
> While P and p are similar, I'm not sure they are as similar as you
> imply. Consider a very simple example. You have a function and you
> want it to use a prefix arg and you want the raw form because you want
> to distinguish between no prefix arg and C-u 1 or M-1. You then define
> a second function, but this time, you want it to default to 1 if no
> prefix arg or whatever the value is if one is provided, then the 'p'
> numeric version is what you want. In each case, the P and p support
> what you need

yes, but one of them would be sufficient.

OTOH we have not a handy code for branching.

Do you know case, "p" receiving M- numeric arg must fail, so C-u NUMBER 
through "P" is needed?


  without you having to do additional code. Yes, you could
> solve this with just the P version, but then you would have to do more
> code to handle the common case of just wanting to process the prefix
> arg as a number.
>
> This additional code

Don't suggest additional code but a better use of "P" - no parallel 
implementations. Having "P" as a branch-flag not affected by "p"

  would likely make the reading of the source even
> more difficult than your example issue with the use of '4' in your
> example. I would also suggest that if you don't like the literal 4 as
> it doesn't make it clear what is going on (why 4?) you could define a
> variable, such as
>