From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1477: 23.0.60; Customize "not marked HIDDEN" is unclear Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:21:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4E1A25FD.7080600@dogan.se> References: <001701c954d6$30970d30$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310336612 7824 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2011 22:23:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:23:32 +0000 (UTC) To: 1477@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 00:23:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2PQ-0005VE-7e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:23:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45526 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2PO-00062q-RZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2P2-00062A-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2P1-0005dS-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2P0-0005dN-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2P0-0000gl-36; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Deniz Dogan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1477 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13103365612619 (code B ref -1); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2011 22:22:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2Oe-0000gC-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2Ob-0000fz-Oo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2OV-0005Wl-8W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:47842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2OU-0005Wh-QO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2OT-0005vZ-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2OR-0005W3-IA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp04.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.153.5]:44831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2OR-0005Vv-8w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from c80-216-105-155.bredband.comhem.se ([80.216.105.155]:55249 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by ch-smtp04.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qg2O4-00010B-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:22:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: 80.216.105.155 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Qg2O4-00010B-EG. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp04.sth.basefarm.net 1Qg2O4-00010B-EG 811ed00823bc5493e8aa2661c4704494 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:23:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48519 Archived-At: On 2011-07-10 23:58, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > "Drew Adams" writes: > >> It should have simply been closed, which records it as a _bug_ that >> has been _fixed_. It should not have been recorded as `notabug'. > > I thought "fixed" was if it was fixed as a result of the bug report, and > "notabug" was if it turned out (when investigated) that the report > reported something that wasn't a bug (ever or still). > > Perhaps we need a third flag, like > "probablyabugatthetimeitwasreportedbutnotabugwhensomeonelookedatthebugreport"? > > Or perhaps just close it without a flag. Opinions? > If it was once a bug but was fixed before someone looked at the bug report, "fixed" seems appropriate to me. Deniz