From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8936: 24.0.50; Incompatible change in the meaning of "other window" Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4E072A6B.8040302@gmx.at> References: <19974.24793.979873.787090@rgr.rgrjr.com> <4E06FBEA.6010202@gmx.at> <4E07221C.9060704@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309092551 7231 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2011 12:49:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8936@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 14:49:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaolu-0006CD-Qx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:49:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaolu-0000cx-1Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaoku-0000V8-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaokt-0007kI-2n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaoks-0007in-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaoks-0004DM-3w; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8936 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8936-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8936.130909246916182 (code B ref 8936); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8936) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2011 12:47:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaokf-0004Cx-05 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qaokc-0004Ck-1q for 8936@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:47:47 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2011 12:47:40 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-38-149.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.38.149]) [62.47.38.149] by mail.gmx.net (mp053) with SMTP; 26 Jun 2011 14:47:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/4pyI4O3b4y84QwKVWl6k54HMu8wt9p5HnNDbAQL 2yW97obE0ey3e9 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 08:48:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47499 Archived-At: > I would consider making the another-frame behavior an option, then. > I think I would be more surprised to see a new frame than to have the > same window reused, if my current frame is so tiny. YMMV, of course > (and I do see the rationale behind your design decision). OK. But I first have to understand why Bob's Emacs doesn't pop up a new window in the first place. martin