From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8911: bs-cycle-next deletes window in some cases. Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:36:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4E00C885.1060700@gmx.at> References: <4E009EB0.1050903@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308676522 7168 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2011 17:15:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 8911@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 19:15:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ4Xk-0007BG-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:15:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ4Xj-0000JM-DN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3wm-0006mz-Q0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3wl-0003M1-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3wk-0003Lv-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3wk-0007qq-5C; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8911.130867419430141 (code B ref 8911); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2011 16:36:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3wH-0007q6-J9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZ3wE-0007po-2N for 8911@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2011 16:36:22 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-150.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.150]) [62.47.41.150] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 21 Jun 2011 18:36:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Cai4RnVZCSqaMrsQO0KUorvb0bnGHy5cwgXZcVp vvU5l7iUaHMEOR User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47385 Archived-At: >> The trouble was that, when called on a dedicated window, it iconified >> the frame. > > I don't follow: why do you think it's a trouble? To me it's exactly > what I want. Is it that you prefer it deletes the frame rather than > iconify it? No. But I recall that people disliked iconified frames. > Not sure if it's needed. Calling bury-buffer with a non-nil arg should > be sufficient. Indeed, that's the best solution. martin