From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.4 [was Re: Pretest begins end-June] Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:21:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4DEFCBC7.1060403@gmail.com> References: <87y61ojhp4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA1C749D624C8E26F690E1410" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307562512 14373 80.91.229.12 (8 Jun 2011 19:48:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 08 21:48:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUOjm-00030X-7m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:48:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUOjl-0005ST-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUOKB-00054a-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:21:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUOKA-000201-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:21:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:55714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUOK7-0001zN-K5; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so479539pzk.0 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp :content-type; bh=dEw9IsSttujKKHbb6HJfazImGVN7GliLdar0d5h8QNY=; b=EWEcrAK2o8DJOjYpRbXATNC21zWjjmb7ZXpVkmDUV3D9iJ8hVxgbjyPg9zZMpgaU6t r5T1oFUlaDu7W+4jgQd3BF2UMDQ2qERPaBoHBSQr4WJNucrll52/znPPpGXqHkXXbuXm jdBwXIqiiy4SLMi5gvMoX99jLhAT6nihoU7Zs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type; b=Y1LQAcN1Kq8bNCajRTsWfS5XNXPQdb1vKoregfDo1pb67ykR7fBfunHAdUEkNS6Pig kP55ViutVQiotEDBFv2TXvhsSeJCYWuwUHfSyLnV5qggXqjcboX2se9df3d2+CQhxOup 6HVaMfiRUzUuoN/HxHX52CF5BSnmX+eGjFgcE= Original-Received: by 10.142.59.4 with SMTP id h4mr326383wfa.46.1307560910361; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [0.0.0.0] (c-24-18-179-193.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.18.179.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v6sm880218wfe.14.2011.06.08.12.21.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:21:48 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=5035D15B X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140307 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA1C749D624C8E26F690E1410 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/8/2011 8:35 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Stefan and I have decided on the end of June for the beginning of the= >>> Emacs 24.1 pretest. We're hoping for an early 2012 release, but, as >>> always, that will depend on the code. >> In light of this, I wonder if you could comment on whether you expect >> there to be a 23.4? >> Since the above plan is a relatively short time-scale, and since there= >> are no show-stopping problems with 23.3 (so far), I'm hoping we can ge= t >> away without a 23.4. >=20 > That's also my hope. Is it okay to make changes to the emacs-23 branch just in case? If we *do* release a 23.4, marking lexical-binding as a safe local variable would make some annoyances go away. --------------enigA1C749D624C8E26F690E1410 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3vy8kACgkQ17c2LVA10Vv3UACfeCGUwKMuTXz8oOOP2KKO7b7q XYsAoM7x1q5xuzOVwil3u7Cwgl6VH8Sy =ugZ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA1C749D624C8E26F690E1410--