From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ERT indentation testing Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:12:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4DE8CFA8.5020707@gmx.at> References: <87pqngewwp.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87pqnfu51p.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87d3jf3ef8.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87fwobasiy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxi1qlwv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o48axbk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tyc7i1yw.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307103948 22351 80.91.229.12 (3 Jun 2011 12:25:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:25:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 03 14:25:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTRf-0001Rh-16 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:25:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52248 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTRd-0000XB-WE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTEt-0005c3-KY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:12:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTEs-00083o-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:12:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:36399) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSTEr-00083G-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jun 2011 12:12:25 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-33-83.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.33.83]) [62.47.33.83] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 03 Jun 2011 14:12:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+k2sARXBakmujOqBMYI6k/LpnM7jyuIJzg6cDeLp DTS2iqSzqLYPzg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87tyc7i1yw.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140120 Archived-At: > Using `find-file-noselect' will just make me select the buffer in ELisp > instead of expecting it to become current. Is there any real reason to > avoid `find-file'? Because of the prompts? I ask because I'm curious; > I've already changed my patch to use (set-buffer (find-file-noselect...)) > but can't commit because the Bazaar repo is down. `find-file' uses `switch-to-buffer' and `switch-to-buffer' should be avoided in Elisp code. > Also, if `find-file' should be avoided in ELisp generally, the docstring > should say so, like it does for many other functions. Indeed. martin