From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-Shop Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:44:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4DE4FEC5.3020207@online.de> References: <4DE4E1A7.70406@online.de> <87pqmzrmkp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306853084 21076 80.91.229.12 (31 May 2011 14:44:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 16:44:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQBS-0001IG-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:44:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56258 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQBR-0000nJ-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQBL-0000mz-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:44:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQBH-00071V-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:58785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRQBG-00071M-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:44:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.27] (brln-4db9f939.pool.mediaWays.net [77.185.249.57]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MWzzA-1Q4CLC3r2y-00VwVC; Tue, 31 May 2011 16:44:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 SUSE/3.1.10 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <87pqmzrmkp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:DZjky2abc4m/Y1HzWoXZPb/en7kNxBwZOfsrdIk5LXn sY8N3YGysaDTmCG3hS9ibldjDrrscFj5kJIKN2tDSYjMvWiVZx yYdGHzUqHwMziA1rxmHC4xqxAHWLX2yL9VJ/o5Q5R1lmQqS6UX tb2vq+q7tVh3EkYDFxPOaVWWyNCPg59DJ5gcBg8B0ZwB86Gs+3 YfWII7xLaHzJIUGcGxCuJpvlY0iw7GypjUm+mep4Rw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 212.227.126.171 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139975 Archived-At: Am 31.05.2011 16:06, schrieb Thien-Thi Nguyen: > () Andreas Röhler > () Tue, 31 May 2011 14:40:07 +0200 > > Some non-free editors are ahead in certain areas, > because they offer special tailored features. > > [...] > > What do you think? > > This brings to mind a recent Emacs Wiki addition in which > it was remarked that Lucid was neat but did not sell: > > http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/NeilSmithline > yes, but it only tells why Emacs hardly sells themselves. Didn't propose that. Have a look at the charts to get some impression what sells. So if Emacs is big opera of already Wagnerian scope, why not sell some tune from it in order to refund some persons how might need it? Andreas