From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Scholtes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL) Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 16:54:50 -0600 Message-ID: <4DC47C3A.6060201@gmail.com> References: <4DC230CF.8070803@gmail.com> <4DC2994D.8020103@gmail.com> <83iptpm68b.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyd7lve2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304722515 22504 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2011 22:55:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 22:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 00:55:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QITvN-0002mG-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 00:55:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QITvM-0004Nj-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QITvK-0004Mh-Fg for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QITvJ-0000tl-Bk for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:58151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QITvI-0000sd-6X; Fri, 06 May 2011 18:55:00 -0400 Original-Received: by iwg8 with SMTP id 8so4111052iwg.0 for ; Fri, 06 May 2011 15:54:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=03K7R6+eTWcGqliq4WEJcY8w15PbzxlztFsuCxvAFqY=; b=xpPrf7HKidoQvThicSp2tPliguJkQ0jHAzykkDskH+iMdmSdcLgjHbK2RCa3BM+Man fXKQ1Djm3B5vMxul6JrUFXvaVoxIavJjd16Xj6XyrTAZ+fevqlQR1xCmgzuuHNtjn6Dm BAnJETJ5YRnlG45NMHww7CB0ducnzLOk6QaQ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bU/JrXkbF+O0sJiFGSvrEQHgRPgbgbgaZgmvHneU+dNf6yEqpzX5jnKuTuCIS5U9RF 5AEubR5L7wN6iv3qkkUNuYv+fZiekYAkEZkXBNn2FycYXSkvAupvlWcscGWdjtsQY3kg gRD6fxQUlC96M3QJBCdjgEPjYqriujezWbUsA= Original-Received: by 10.231.67.213 with SMTP id s21mr2683048ibi.22.1304722498653; Fri, 06 May 2011 15:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (70-59-12-84.hlrn.qwest.net [70.59.12.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1506529ibc.59.2011.05.06.15.54.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 May 2011 15:54:57 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: <83tyd7lve2.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139184 Archived-At: On 5/6/2011 9:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Simply because no one has invested the effort to see whether the > bootstrap will work without it, and tweaked the w32 Makefiles > accordingly. Those Makefiles are somewhat tricky because they need to > support GNU Make and MS Nmake and also 2 kinds of shell with GNU Make. > The current setup works with all that complexity. So, I just did a `make maintainer-clean', configure, removed the -DPURESIZE=5000000 from src/makefile and then did a `make bootstrap'. Everything builds fine. Does this mean we don't have to go through the two compilation cycles during a bootstrap (once with PURESIZE, once without), but we can just compile it once? I would volunteer to adjust the makefiles to accommodate this. Christoph