From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New function: vc-ediff Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:16:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4D79DA64.9080007@gmx.at> References: <4D785193.3030201@gmail.com> <87ipvqpa6v.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299831479 2316 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2011 08:17:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 11 09:17:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxxXm-0006Sd-EM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:17:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxxXe-0004Wh-Ut for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40418 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxxWb-00048a-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:16:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxxWa-0003cc-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:16:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:38666) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxxWZ-0003cN-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:16:40 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2011 08:16:38 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-42-56.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.42.56]) [62.47.42.56] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 09:16:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19cEhNl/XlcjivrLYuZKc7pKIH05PeX8xoj4PlBBJ IL7rMtF94tWobL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137089 Archived-At: >> Is this different from `ediff-revision'? > > `ediff-revision' asks just a few too many questions. Most of the time, > you just want to compare the current buffer with the latest revision. > So, I find myself having to hit a lot of RETs when I use `ediff-revision'. I agree with Uday - it's annoying. martin