From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How many more gnulib imports? Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:10:49 -0700 Message-ID: <4D62B8B9.1020203@gmail.com> References: <4D60F860.6020303@cs.ucla.edu> <4D613998.6000607@gmail.com> <4D613DB1.9030705@gmail.com> <83mxlqty36.fsf@gnu.org> <4D61A478.3000603@gmail.com> <83bp25tdgs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298315477 28794 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2011 19:11:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 21 20:11:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PrbA3-0000Wl-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:11:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrbA2-0004u2-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49604 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Prb9x-0004st-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Prb9w-0002Nm-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:40818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Prb9p-0002Ls-6i; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:10:53 -0500 Original-Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so3023527iyf.0 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:10:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1mpvTRRnfhiQtPzTxqMQky6Wc+ceQH9qvwKRPm8gTwM=; b=m/9iy5e/JUYG31QeMbeM9S6MZ0UjeSeu+Nhw3Vw0CReQNvI57BM1LvmsH5r1GRFGbO /VI0+wIkxscVCWr3xmTvRnpuk3o+Ddg9cL/+mr+xyROivEA6MDZnM4JDH5TNb4bi4zt0 A6PZCY9EhqYitLqlk/7nPeLdhNi5UWWY4sLb8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pOkKtLhxN7ggQFTCKhagx8CoHM1x4o0vxIi8SF48YQ3R1gKfxTAv2t4/bLKQTpWbyV CMPn5+BiqqTLTo9d/cApugrvg/noPtxlcWOV/tVoxVs+nOq7FnPnVooj8+zZ1s02vhVl uLbewF4mkI4xl4/8ZHYY/tz1J4+PsJ4HZp+ds= Original-Received: by 10.231.19.133 with SMTP id a5mr1424869ibb.78.1298315452272; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:10:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (71-208-133-70.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.133.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm5430106ibe.8.2011.02.21.11.10.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:10:51 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <83bp25tdgs.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136333 Archived-At: On 2/21/2011 12:05 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks. I will commit it as soon as the Windows build is fixed (it > became broken due to the import of filemode.c from gnulib). OK. I am taking a stab on fixing the latest filemode issues right now. If you are too, please let me know. > Please note that nt/inc/stdint.h you sent has DOS EOLs. We generally > use Unix EOLs, except in DOS/Windows batch files. Sorry about that. I will pay attention to that next time. Christoph