From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7802: bug #7802: 24.0.50; Extraneous `mouse-3' event when do `double-mouse-3' Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:50:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4D28BFF7.5070001@gmx.de> References: <6AF23E536D254FC88C35DA0BEC775C1A@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294516453 13977 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2011 19:54:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 19:54:13 +0000 (UTC) To: 7802@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 20:54:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PberZ-0001ie-2A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:54:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49580 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PberW-0005Vv-GO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:54:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46940 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PberS-0005Vn-K9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:54:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PberR-0006zv-Il for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PberR-0006zr-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:54:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbehm-0001U7-IO; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <6AF23E536D254FC88C35DA0BEC775C1A@us.oracle.com> Resent-From: grischka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7802 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7802-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7802.12945157825637 (code B ref 7802); Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7802) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2011 19:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbego-0001Ss-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbegl-0001SO-Oh for 7802@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jan 2011 19:50:18 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.45.86.128]) [82.113.121.202] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 08 Jan 2011 20:50:18 +0100 X-Authenticated: #18588216 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/hDkUjoXvh3l0srbzu4VJ78JJVgvBkdIAy3OJ+Lu iLTLrpr0xSd39S User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:44:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43214 Archived-At: >> No. Windows does the same as Emacs, which is why we inherit this >> behaviour. No. If the application does not set CS_DBLCLKS (which emacs doesn't), Windows sends single clicks only always. > Emacs design is based on Windows behavior (shudder)? ;-) > > (No, I assume that you mean only that the Emacs implementation for Windows > adapts to Windows limitations.) > Emacs limits Windows to behave like X in favor for its own implementation which behaves like Windows. --- grischka