From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7368: Testcase Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:32:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4CDE4D2D.2000304@gmx.at> References: <87y690q1qa.fsf@neo.paramonovs> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289637869 13360 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2010 08:44:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 08:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7368@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 09:44:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHBih-0004iL-KY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:44:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHBif-0008EH-AW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38402 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHBiL-0008DE-M5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHBiK-000555-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHBiK-00054v-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:44:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHBSs-00075t-7t; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 08:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7368 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7368-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7368.128963687927263 (code B ref 7368); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 08:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7368) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2010 08:27:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHBSo-00075g-VS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:27:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHBSm-00075Q-Gt for 7368@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:27:57 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2010 08:32:46 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-61-175.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.61.175]) [62.47.61.175] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 13 Nov 2010 09:32:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19UTPJbZYFU8Aeh/VXwh10rc18kmymy59aCwdwrMf YT134oyB7XDsym User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:28:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41541 Archived-At: > C-h v pop-up-frames RET says: > > pop-up-frames's value is nil > > Documentation: > Whether `display-buffer' should make a separate frame. > If nil, never make a separate frame. > > However, a new frame *does* pop up for me after running the following code: > > (let ((foo (get-buffer-create "foo.el")) > (bar (get-buffer-create "bar.el"))) > (switch-to-buffer foo) > (delete-other-windows) > (completion-at-point) > (display-buffer bar t)) On my trunk Emacs your code produces a new window on the selected frame. Apparently, some of your settings prevent it from splitting the selected window and the second argument t means `display-buffer' must not reuse the selected window. So `display-buffer' simply has no other choice but making a new frame. BTW, the snippet (progn (delete-other-windows) (display-buffer (other-buffer) t)) should be sufficient for exhibiting the behavior you observe. martin