From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:20:54 -0700 Message-ID: <4CAD90F6.9050008@gmail.com> References: <4CAA0FFC.5020809@gmail.com> <8739skokjl.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig01B5B9D8FF234FC46D32D393" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286443447 24791 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2010 09:24:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 11:24:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3mho-0002Fc-W8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:24:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3mho-0005ax-6y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44364 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3mhZ-0005YX-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:23:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3mf3-0006XR-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]:36444) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3mf2-0006X2-0J; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so551546qyk.0 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=sDFH3TRPrbzKvQAUJVesnN+nKsuSQjuYqdpw311fbTQ=; b=IJ6dqh52f+wKiKmZrvZFOjLPqKkOyQWwzp87XgZzPwwuM8niPyiOMy+ksaZc63LTb1 yh+5ZEjeqHwzsjbGY/qwyofBiAA5faKtBNUx0lH52yM6VndYiNrw2bXZgycj94i4cA4M Nrvm8LFwi9d9aV34UDilryUvyjwkVSDHsa0sA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=Mc7Y/UsstvBrGQDJMKQ1+oGHGLwR5Gr34elTipT8VHbumVDiaIInFFuXKQnqeVA4ll XtacxZXdkGSb+hZRSkl9pP1fx94KgMQvVppeAE0HBEVk+YE+W5eus6z+onBTkOKMRShA woOZMDNMSS8+DuuiquyErEV4cpgQPSX4Teemc= Original-Received: by 10.224.180.8 with SMTP id bs8mr106053qab.146.1286443262772; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 66.237.78.173.ptr.us.xo.net (66.237.78.173.ptr.us.xo.net [66.237.78.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f32sm798543qcq.39.2010.10.07.02.20.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 02:21:00 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131418 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig01B5B9D8FF234FC46D32D393 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/6/10 4:41 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > I hope that's not an impediment. Maybe it can be an optional extra= > volume to the ELisp manual. >=20 > If they will be used often, putting them in an extra volume > is not a good solution. >=20 > Likewise, omitting them from the printed edition is not a solution. If any new feature must be documented, and the documentation cannot exceed a certain size, then new features cannot be added. Are you proposing to cap the size of Emacs? Or does this logic only apply to things named "cl.el"? --------------enig01B5B9D8FF234FC46D32D393 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkytkPoACgkQ17c2LVA10VtSBgCeOg6kbBdc5jBCL+cvfF+f7Ako ercAnRpP+B0DNGRVndOOrFdp0y80eUY3 =MMBx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig01B5B9D8FF234FC46D32D393--