From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7004: 23.2; In fullscreen mode, the echo area takes too much vertical space Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:29:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4C9326ED.2080605@gmx.at> References: <4C89F3E3.6080804@swipnet.se> <4C8A3D5F.10502@swipnet.se> <4C8AC907.80102@harpegolden.net> <4C8B34C6.5060906@swipnet.se> <83r5gx4y6e.fsf@gnu.org> <4C8E748F.5040107@swipnet.se> <83aanl4fm3.fsf@gnu.org> <4C8E8E3B.7010305@swipnet.se> <831v8x49p3.fsf@gnu.org> <4C8F1E31.8030904@gmx.at> <83vd682puw.fsf@gnu.org> <4C906F09.2030809@gmx.at> <83fwxa3iug.fsf@gnu.org> <4C91C5E8.50508@gmx.at> <4C91F87D.4070306@swipnet.se> <4C920919.500@gmx.at> <4C921CCE.2000805@swipnet.se> <4C92430E.8080907@gmx.at> <4C92FBC6.4080905@swipnet.se> <4C930BF7.8040204@gmx.at> <4C93140F.5060709@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284713413 31323 80.91.229.12 (17 Sep 2010 08:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7004@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 17 10:50:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwWdy-0004TY-Dn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:50:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50940 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwWdx-0003Ok-QM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55187 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwWdp-0003Na-Ql for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwWdo-0001yv-Hn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwWdo-0001yj-G3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwWIc-0006rh-B5; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7004 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7004-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7004.128471203826352 (code B ref 7004); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7004) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Sep 2010 08:27:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwWHt-0006qy-Gq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwWHq-0006qm-Rm for 7004@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2010 08:29:35 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-32-236.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.32.236]) [62.47.32.236] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 17 Sep 2010 10:29:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ZgutF2jJZXjibZRuVUSPDCZAMOs1o7Gv2r4rWem 24wEpadgE9QIkL User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <4C93140F.5060709@swipnet.se> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40241 Archived-At: > You also have to fix distribution of window sizes so that in a layout > like this: > > ----------------------------- > | | | > | | | > ---------------- | > | | | | > | 1 | 2 | 3 | > | | | | > ----------------------------- > > it is 1, 2 and 3 that gets the leftoer pixels. Moreover, if 1 or 2 are fixed-size I should give the pixels to the unnamed window above. > Handling split and delete > of windows correctly can be hard. Splitting works line based and the number of lines of a window is not affected by pixels. In particular, answering the question whether a window can be split in the first place is unaffected by pixels. Now the parent window of the split window has a pixel-height and I have to reapply the same procedure as for frame resizing recursively to each of its child windows. For deleting I add the leftover pixels to the window(s) that get the lines of the window deleted. Finally the display-engine must be able to deal with window top-lines/left-columns and height/width given in pixels. So the window structure will probably have four additional slots like pixel-top, pixel-left, pixel-height, and pixel-width and the display engine must be able to interpret these. martin