From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:02:39 +0800 Message-ID: <4C78602F.50102@gnu.org> References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87tymlv41y.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8D701A9E7D444011925CB68BF0883D2B@us.oracle.com> <87hbikdss4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87iq2yzvpo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <15A1E47393A44678811B41A238C09E73@us.oracle.com> <87wrrd3qot.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C77AB35.4010803@gnu.org> <87eidjj3zk.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282957394 28398 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2010 01:03:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 03:03:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op9pA-0006Q5-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 03:03:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51588 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Op9p9-0005JV-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43600 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Op9ox-0005H2-Uf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op9os-0002Bs-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:53500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Op9os-0002Bm-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so2351605pzk.0 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AerQTCE6NL4sCrEBXF1jLvMEv4y/5xkSURGw3H3srjU=; b=xtjXIkIRvt1bEvDU/YeayfIbW3ZmO8pp5ddfapl+2seQsA3uZN9/1Y9I/+FFuq0a77 RKU+X3hFzGBPMvUHWn+c2hFgUiHn/ip0OGHhkgpwrpVsdiAU1Pws737qjn7c8cA56JR0 tXulXa6GkeEMqA6GG21mTBq0LD8vf+1nhqlgk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HjaGFWiYDIfANgVaeyyBkNcifk2TegIA4GpmLXnNkF+hd9RoNarCMoiwurAweZO3+3 AWlV+4NxDBOEiPuhDjG30oI85xtq+JkEfQass73sQQbu9GRqXsRKNuIKIPtp9qPtXiri BX4HLFkysdv2fpPMVLAArlRgzXc5/DQrH1AXU= Original-Received: by 10.114.109.1 with SMTP id h1mr1325985wac.203.1282957373515; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.249.100] ([202.87.221.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d39sm7713394wam.16.2010.08.27.18.02.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:02:51 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 In-Reply-To: <87eidjj3zk.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129327 Archived-At: On 28/8/2010 6:38 AM, Juri Linkov wrote: >> IIRC, last time we discussed this, we decided that the latter approach >> would be best. We also considered adopting the GTK approach and replacing >> _ with ~ on windows (and whatever is appropriate on Mac), but that leaves >> lucid and text menus needing to remove the character all the time. > It seems I missed this decision in this overlong thread. It seems there has been a more recent thread. I was thinking of a thread from several years ago.