From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: forward-paragraph return value Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:25:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4C72BD0A.8090104@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282587974 21812 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2010 18:26:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:26:14 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 23 20:26:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Onbim-0002Km-P9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:26:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Onbim-0001to-4a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51590 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Onbid-0001su-My for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Onbib-00069d-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:63088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Onbia-00069E-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.27] (brln-4db9da5d.pool.mediaWays.net [77.185.218.93]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MURVP-1OMyBC3ztr-00RJZV; Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:25:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:XkuEZqCf+f4+iKlcbOBVtodZ9KpaQNo9YvuYue2sokS lWLW0DJN5+56HH6a8Xx2iVuHRrKiAAUmcONcwEpwh8C+LnB5yf m1ifpvyJXAHli2zt3QNzzM/86kgjC7DnmNowsqAYcniUtMjSba 7mkoEyDlpc0YINkaah4LleVoy9d0e26C3b2+8BoxUyqHDVKgo0 P6A/P1+TYsLQ0jnwqHFoRJZHUTBgdvr0h/7UsB+PJY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129093 Archived-At: Hi, `forward-paragraph' presently returns "0" if the number of steps given by ARG is completed. It's code ends with: ;; Return the number of steps that could not be done. arg)) IMHO buffer-position reached is a more useful return value. Function may return point only when successfully, nil otherwise. Thanks all Andreas -- https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/