From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:30:52 +0800 Message-ID: <4C65E3BC.8010502@gnu.org> References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.30901.687000.971249@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.47167.15000.439215@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87fwys7qao.fsf@telefonica.net> <87hbj8qvd9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87iq3k68ye.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874of466rj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pqxsbrie.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87k4nv7t72.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <19556.28233.750000.798692@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87aaoqjzge.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281745878 31848 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2010 00:31:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:31:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 02:31:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ok4ea-00008g-B6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:31:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ok4eZ-0002mI-M3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:31:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54505 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ok4eU-0002lo-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ok4eT-0000O0-Jc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:61767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ok4eT-0000Nu-FF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so357119pwi.0 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:31:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2PukwpoG+KMx5iLG/Ty4JbSjLeCKwfNLA8bniCEld2Y=; b=BYzgu4Q+hmtjm4F6ulRy1FnAWNg1KR8emv8ubsrqWzflrlZKz9vH22nrIzmmIn1/GW EAnhztCrfbZdFZPbgD6PHfYv1HiPxBerSuAW5aY55M0Vv9a+1IbQwa62iCzkKjcEnVOO nQOZ24W5LQXO3vVvRiuIW1Its4uS58dCTtV3k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZXApZ05sB7uPlttbSj5bCcIpbSwurZIjxhuotp66P5L/PrJqInxuDdU/mLGsj4H4/R VQfFmEPE3CYIJbpJHeCmc5BvcO8uM/2v2TMOA+qyTAXUriZCTl5s+1daZIPvNbHbc3CI aApEGzWVrDRiXg2LHfx9Rp1qfooEMiY3yJUf8= Original-Received: by 10.143.28.18 with SMTP id f18mr1885901wfj.99.1281745868313; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.249.102] ([202.87.221.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 33sm3773334wfg.21.2010.08.13.17.31.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:31:06 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128648 Archived-At: On 14/8/2010 12:04 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > Beside that it would not solve the problem that Emacs on w32 does not > allow people which needs sticky keys to use it, i.e. it does not allow > access for some disabled people. Can you please point me to the bug report where you explained this in detail. I have tried searching, and cannot find anything other than a report that the Alt key needs to be pressed twice to open the menu - which turned out to be the case for any program. As far as I can tell, sticky keys work perfectly fine with Emacs, but I don't have much experience with using them, so maybe I am missing something subtle that would prevent disabled people from using them.