From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why and not "config.h" ? Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:06:03 +0200 Message-ID: <4C4FD6DB.7080901@online.de> References: <87wrsgs5t3.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280300516 6143 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2010 07:01:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 09:01:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0eG-00008g-NE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:01:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oe0eG-00032t-7B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:01:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49582 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oe0e9-00032e-Uf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:01:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0e8-00045m-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:60153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe0e8-00045Q-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.27] (p5DDB0A87.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.219.10.135]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MCx2B-1Om1Gi33wZ-009kKj; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:01:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 In-Reply-To: <87wrsgs5t3.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ajBeO7qq/iFt1+DLtksVSVCPGF3QPs/pt+OVz1Z70oK 0IE0Nrl/ihBQgBk0ZvuGMNwmcgq1KgGUFRfvLJj6NsBl7lKm5M oiQ/vm1SeF1dyaK5gUZTeWxUVwKnj37rBO0g79Ca9LUlE7FoHN SUX4uc4M766H5RwV/XjHSfM7h/0X93yLXx4mSI32Ealw3rt0T9 394csms1lJ9++cEWvDUaugt6NmSNg8+HHu5a6RhNkI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127914 Archived-At: Am 28.07.2010 04:23, schrieb Óscar Fuentes: > Emacs sources use the idiom > > #include > > Is there a specific reason for this? Usually the curly braces Hi, just a language question, not to get non-native english speakers -as you and me :-) bewildered. Does "<...>" really mean curly? IMHO these "{...}" are curly... Do I misunderstand something? Best regards, Andreas -- https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/ > are for > headers that live outside the project. Some code analysis tools assume > that. And some compilers (including gcc, AFAIK) use a different > procedure for locating headers surrounded by curly braces, which may > produce unexpected results for headers included from config.h. > > Any objections to replacing and with "config.h" > and "epaths.h" ? > > > >