From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6674: PATCH: fix assignment of grep-find-use-xargs on Windows/MS-DOS Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:38:32 -0600 Message-ID: <4C464188.8080901@gmail.com> References: <878w564xtc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87vd8a2rxg.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5iy2ptw.fsf@telefonica.net> <83vd8acbbv.fsf@gnu.org> <87eiey2apg.fsf@telefonica.net> <83tyntde64.fsf@gnu.org> <83sk3ddcfk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279674073 32512 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2010 01:01:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:01:13 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 21 03:01:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNgO-0001N8-56 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:01:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39077 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObNgN-00023W-Mw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39549 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObNfw-0001tM-IS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNfv-0001iv-Kj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:00:44 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNfv-0001iq-I1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:00:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNKv-0006oJ-OI; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6674 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127967270226168 (code B ref -1); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2010 00:38:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNKG-0006o1-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:38:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNKF-0006nw-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:48727) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNKe-0003zb-94 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58834 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObNKd-0007iB-3P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:38:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNKb-0007Ji-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:51128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObNKb-0007JW-Ks; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:38:41 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so4189010gxk.0 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:38:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=chqrbmK4OnUmp8PoFGWN0delwNoF/zwUeDdhjv0VeP0=; b=qHMFDFoghzffjj0wy+192IfXEY8L2UkwHqwk8Jl+EEJhXc2f8+oK/dUkW9ls8NXAlj m5vI8ZqPxc1lZhs/z5mmWbjptt9IwMcpZkFfAXGpn1l/K+9Dw2s38tEV/nHSwVMyaZMx /FpO0qBsEBxefMaPteJoPf2Q6PyPdU1m6x9HE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Jy2P4KKIZg/iAFSZrVOujJBQJjIaMeNUkyK07WlndcQvQoAXWS0v0fk2pWpTFUMCUu bO9d6qxxsHmaC4/mNgbXHpJYZrC33+Ml2S0FIHXY5WtBfQSTm6RBb5yvdu2uId1JgDQh mSjnj7iUdv0Hr2asJho7DHLL5etFcfBPbUeDM= Original-Received: by 10.100.151.4 with SMTP id y4mr7416869and.247.1279672719944; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.5] (97-122-118-250.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.118.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1sm78392537anc.39.2010.07.20.17.38.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:38:39 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 In-Reply-To: <83sk3ddcfk.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:39:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38713 Archived-At: On 7/20/2010 4:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > A better (and easier implemented) idea would be to create a temporary > batch file with the command line and run the batch file with cmd.exe. > The original command works just fine if invoked from a batch file. Out of curiosity, why is a batch file solution better than enhancing cmdproxy? Christoph