From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6608: Menu bar not working Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:34:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4C3F0E5A.2000905@alice.it> References: <4C39866C.6050008@alice.it> <4C398730.7040405@alice.it> <83k4p2v078.fsf@gnu.org> <4C399209.9020105@alice.it> <4C3A1037.2000409@swipnet.se> <87iq4lwtct.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4C3ABF09.3080804@swipnet.se> <4C3AEF7D.8060605@alice.it> <4C3D8EA8.20701@swipnet.se> <4C3E3316.5040107@alice.it> <4C3EA618.9040508@swipnet.se> <4C3F04DF.3000009@alice.it> <83y6dcgakp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279202441 24109 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2010 14:00:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 15 16:00:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOzL-0006RC-1D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:00:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZOzK-0000Dl-Gg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:00:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59228 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZOzB-0000Ch-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOz9-0007T4-Qt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOz9-0007T0-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOab-0002FM-OG; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:35:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Angelo Graziosi Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6608 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12792008678628 (code B ref -1); Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2010 13:34:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOa2-0002F6-Dy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOa0-0002F1-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:45827) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOaB-0001MR-N1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40257 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZOa3-0007r8-8Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOZy-0002i0-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp204.alice.it ([82.57.200.100]:48481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZOZx-0002hh-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:34:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.1.239.232] (87.1.239.232) by smtp204.alice.it (8.5.124.08) id 4C3B17590038093C; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:34:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 In-Reply-To: <83y6dcgakp.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 98 (1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:35:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38557 Archived-At: Il 15/07/2010 15.04, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto: >> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:53:51 +0200 >> From: Angelo Graziosi >> Cc: Chong Yidong, bug-gnu-emacs >> >> Il 15/07/2010 8.09, Jan Dj=C3=A4rv ha scritto: >>> As it clearly says below: "the emacs-23 branch". It has not even >>> propagated to the trunk yet, it is a manual operation and it isn't do= ne >>> every day. >> >> Hmm... This means that #6608 should not be closed as 'FIXED' if we can= 't >> verify this on trunk. > > ??? Why? The problem is fixed on a branch. No one says it must only > be fixed on the trunk If you want it with the trunk now and cannot > wait for the merge, you can merge it yourself, manually. If it later > turns out that the fix does not solve the problem, the bug could be > reopened. > > Please don't increase the burden of those who fix bugs more than it is > already. Eli, as you can see, I wrote also: > Just for completeness, rev.100823 contains a new 'xmenu.c' file which, = then, is not yet good for us :-). So, one expected the fix was propagated to trunk... and the request to=20 non close the bug was only by precaution, just to avoid the overload 'of=20 those who fix bugs'. Evidently, my mental processes are too simple. Thanks for your work and *Sorry* for the noise. Ciao, Angelo.