Re: Speedbar too large?

["Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

Yes, please do.

Note in the report that starting from -Q doesn't work as X resources are involved.

Thanks,

	Jan D.


Angelo Graziosi skrev 2010-07-13 01.03:
> Il 10/07/2010 15.30, Angelo Graziosi ha scritto:
>> Il 10/07/2010 14.46, Jan Djärv ha scritto:
>>> I don't get that. Do you get this with -Q?.
>>> You probably have some X resource that sets geometry to 80x40, or perhaps
>>> something in ~/.emacs.
>>
>> Really I have
>>
>> Emacs.geometry: 80x40-0+0
>>
>> in my ~/.Xdefaults file. This did not happen with builds I did a few
>> days ago. What changed? and why now should Speedbar follow
>> Emacs.geometry? It do not look good to me, in any case. I do not see
>> valid reasons for which if one choose 80x40 for Emacs, then also
>> Speedbar should have that...
>>
>> Leaving aside my opinions, what can it be done to restore the previous
>> width for Speedbar? and what about the other questions I flagged?
>
> Ping? Should I file a bug report for this too?
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Angelo.
>
>>
>>> Jan D.
>>>
>>>
>>> Angelo Graziosi skrev 2010-07-10 13.52:
>>>> In recent build of Emacs trunk, the frame of Speedbar looks too large:
>>>> its
>>>> width is >= to that of Emacs frame (usually 80x40), see the attachment.
>>>>
>>>> Is this to be expected?
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to call Speedbar in the same Emacs window, not in new
>>>> frame? If
>>>> not this should be added... Emacs would appear similar to other modern
>>>> IDE...
>>>> But, perhaps, the best solution would be to add ECB in Emacs likewise
>>>> CEDET
>>>> was added...[*]
>>>>
>>>> Ciao,
>>>> Angelo.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> [*] Interesting is this long thread:
>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-07/msg00310.html
>>