From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Efforts to attract more users? Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:52:26 -0600 Message-ID: <4C37A82A.1090701@gmail.com> References: <877hl6jbh3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278715970 26175 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2010 22:52:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:52:50 +0000 (UTC) To: rms@gnu.org, stuhacking@gmail.com, stephen@xemacs.org, Adrian.B.Robert@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 10 00:52:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXMR3-0006cV-0u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:52:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXMR2-0008Lm-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:52:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38840 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXMQx-0008Kk-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXMQw-0004Zt-BT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:59039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXMQt-0004ZZ-Io; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so1981255gwb.0 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vi0pi6zMnfbaX0szW61PS6YBYsPB5Zf9cqcX5nhcDi0=; b=P7q0no8+RlP+sMF0BSCvyDBv/ny+x0RSUms/WfAHfond1wEjEH85D24/VmjEg4ILhY V0qwXHtAptZkNigvR3s1l4/t/24uyTPctGEvdgxelk5wxBjhlmSTiskxDje9fhyaUyTA m0hXaW/AgVmF0AdWF3QdAnNeuuDYY+B34jbrk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=c5cPpzET/aBa7Imh3vxrmezVjXhLjENbhB63Gm2nmOA/7s/yMMVUPXJ+0nZvFeEodJ ox68uIhHZuI31sR3BDAbXtoKWW+XsiDFHvc5CyO464oAml70F5iXmFjqtu3JPqa+pMLA 02OokjFU1uUzw+5NmQmYHY+1MsZJyxLM5H2vM= Original-Received: by 10.100.50.33 with SMTP id x33mr12367370anx.79.1278715954159; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (97-122-111-58.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.111.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c19sm15958772ana.22.2010.07.09.15.52.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:52:32 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126969 Archived-At: On 7/9/2010 3:46 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > Is there any reason why we can't make C-s and C-r use the regexp > equivalents? > > I would not like having to use regexp search by default. > I'd rather leave that on C-M-s. > Is there anything that search can do that regular expression search can't? Would anyone who is not familiar with regexp search even notice a difference? Christoph