From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6535: 24.0.50; grep seems not to work Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4C2A16C7.2020709@swipnet.se> References: <6813-Mon28Jun2010175948+0100-jpff@codemist.co.uk> <87eifqtf38.fsf@gmail.com> <4C29C027.3010700@swipnet.se> <876312t7iz.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277827176 28649 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2010 15:59:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6535@debbugs.gnu.org, john ffitch To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 29 17:59:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTdDe-0008Fh-8Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:59:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36418 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTdDd-0001X8-Mz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56464 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTdDY-0001Ww-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTdDX-0005hk-Mi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:59:24 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTdDX-0005hf-LM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTd7O-0005Ih-De; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6535 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6535-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6535.127782676820369 (code B ref 6535); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6535) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2010 15:52:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTd7A-0005IU-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:52:48 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h12.telenor.se ([62.127.194.5]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTd78-0005IP-PT for 6535@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:52:47 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb3.telenor.se (ipb3.telenor.se [195.54.127.166]) by smtprelay-h12.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64673EBE1D for <6535@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:41 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.35] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Akg9AEKzKUxV4S0jPGdsb2JhbACDHYRSl1IMAQEBATUtrzORK4EpgwlyBIZp X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,505,1272837600"; d="scan'208";a="539331785" Original-Received: from c-232de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.35]) by ipb3.telenor.se with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2010 17:52:40 +0200 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20DA67FA05A; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:52:40 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1 In-Reply-To: <876312t7iz.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:53:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38110 Archived-At: =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec skrev 2010-06-29 13.14: > > Nothing suggests anyone is working on fixing the problem. If you have a > fix, why don't you commit it? I don't have a recepie for repeating the problem turning off ICANON would= =20 solve. It isn't a high priority for me. > If you don't have a fix *now*, why is the > breakage not reverted for the time being? I didn't even get any reactio= n > on this question. That you must ask the person who made that checkin. > > I don't expect the trunk to be perfectly usable all the time, but I fai= l > to see any value in leaving a known and repeatedly reported breakage in > for an extended period of time. > The breakage must have fixed some other problem. If breakage one is bett= er=20 than breakage two is a matter of opinion, depending which one you see the= =20 most. AFAIK, I haven't seen either. Jan D.