From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reto Zimmermann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6207: 23.1; align.el vhdl rules setup Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:18:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4C0E4336.2050108@gnu.org> References: <871vdayqp6.fsf@blah.blah> <4C0505F3.3000304@gnu.org> <87mxv6i91t.fsf@blah.blah> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276008121 10483 80.91.229.12 (8 Jun 2010 14:42:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "6207@debbugs.gnu.org" <6207@debbugs.gnu.org>, John Wiegley To: Kevin Ryde Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 08 16:41:59 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OM006-0005rO-U2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:41:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56250 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLzuO-0000RH-Ny for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57586 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLzmp-0005Mb-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLzmj-00012H-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLzmj-00012C-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:28:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLzVE-0004bh-UW; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:10:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Reto Zimmermann Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6207 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6207-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6207.127600620317702 (code B ref 6207); Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6207) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jun 2010 14:10:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLzVB-0004bL-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from alvesta.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.77]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLyho-0004F4-8M for 6207@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from crone.synopsys.com (crone.synopsys.com [146.225.7.23]) by alvesta.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8A616BB77; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 06:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crone.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA06786; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 06:18:53 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) In-Reply-To: <87mxv6i91t.fsf@blah.blah> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:10:00 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:10:04 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37603 Archived-At: Kevin Ryde wrote: > Reto Zimmermann writes: >> So the settings in align.el are obsolete and could be removed. > > The mechanisms in align.el seem a bit more general. > Should vhdl be using it perhaps with updates to the rules list? The alignment code in vhdl-mode is customized and fine-tuned for VHDL in a a way that I think cannot be implemented with the more general align.el.