From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Window configurations Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 13:45:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4BED37EE.8030405@gmx.at> References: <4BE96186.7060504@gmx.de> <4BEA74B7.2070609@gmx.at> <4BEA8D2D.4090109@gmx.de> <4BEAA73F.4060608@gmx.at> <4BEAF487.1070605@gmx.de> <4BEBD2E3.8020200@gmx.at> <4BEBE52D.5080102@gmx.de> <87eihf3don.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BED300D.1040502@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273837569 14906 80.91.229.12 (14 May 2010 11:46:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: grischka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 14 13:46:07 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCtLC-0002bl-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:46:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44276 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCtLC-0001mZ-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56006 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCtL1-0001l4-AA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCtL0-0004Rq-26 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:45:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55629) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCtKz-0004Re-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 07:45:54 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 May 2010 11:45:52 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-45-110.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.45.110]) [62.47.45.110] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 14 May 2010 13:45:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Au8Zqj/QA26oYi/79vD8a/kOun64MECP9osbAfW ++qKz4aQF9dkDT User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <4BED300D.1040502@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124767 Archived-At: > One aspect of the layout configuration is that windows have names, that > could evolve to a sort of convention. Say, any configuration has to > provide some standard names, then packages/features could choose to > show their stuff in e.g. "edit-area", "sidebar", "tools-window", "top-pane" > (instead of just in "this" or "other" as currently). That's what `display-buffer-function' is for. If a buffer is in some way special wrt a specific package, that package has to take care of displaying it in an appropriate way. martin