From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add function to make frame topmost? Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 09:47:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4BDD2E01.2080405@swipnet.se> References: <4BDB5A6E.5060803@harpegolden.net> <4BDB8886.4050202@harpegolden.net> <4BDC6CE7.8060400@harpegolden.net> <4BDCD2FC.1050407@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272786472 19228 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2010 07:47:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 07:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Stefan Monnier , Emacs-Devel devel To: David De La Harpe Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 02 09:47:49 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8Ttz-00006s-H2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 09:47:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43994 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O8Ttx-0001y4-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 03:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O8Tth-0001xy-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 03:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39005 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O8Tte-0001xP-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 03:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8Ttc-0002lz-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 03:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.196]:46059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O8Ttc-0002lR-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 03:47:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (ipb1.telenor.se [195.54.127.164]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D17C6B2 for ; Sun, 2 May 2010 09:47:20 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.110] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnhAAErL3EtV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACDF4RSlUIMAQEBATUtqE+PZoEmgn5uBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,311,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="69707271" Original-Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 02 May 2010 09:47:14 +0200 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0ECE7FA05A; Sun, 2 May 2010 09:47:13 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4BDCD2FC.1050407@harpegolden.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124415 Archived-At: David De La Harpe Golden skrev 2010-05-02 03.18: > Come to think of it, ringing the bell should probably demands-attention, > so that something (beep)ing in a frame that's not visible isn't missed. > > * > On my system, the interpretation of demands-attention for a frame that's > not immediately visible is that its task bar entry is bolded and starts > gently pulsing blue. demands attention? : That sounds like Compiz. On KDE, the task bar entry gets a blue border that blinks three times, but then is solid blue. But looking in to the future, how is this handeled for tabs? It may be another tab that wants attention. I haven't tested it, but I guess the application would have to deal with that on its own. Jan D.