From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gtk tabs in emacs, new branch Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:33:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4BC215FF.1050107@swipnet.se> References: <4BB4CF6B.2000007@alice.it> <4BB59476.7010600@swipnet.se> <4BB5C01E.10701@alice.it> <4BB608EE.7080101@swipnet.se> <4BB9A469.6050608@alice.it> <4BC072C3.2080302@swipnet.se> <4BC0B692.2000702@alice.it> <4BC0BD6D.3060103@swipnet.se> <4BC0F715.2060605@alice.it> <45EB8DD4-B0F8-4FB3-941F-13FADA4DAD66@swipnet.se> <4BC1854B.2060409@alice.it> <4BC1A9D2.8050607@swipnet.se> <4BC206C0.2010202@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271010827 3013 80.91.229.12 (11 Apr 2010 18:33:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 11 20:33:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O11yb-0005wb-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43866 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O11ya-0001iL-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O11yW-0001iG-Me for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36052 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O11yV-0001i8-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O11yU-0004DT-49 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h11.telenor.se ([62.127.194.4]:33577) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O11yT-0004DF-TM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (ipb2.telenor.se [195.54.127.165]) by smtprelay-h11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB5E2477A for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:33:37 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.110] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al1IAH+ywUtV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACDEoRSk2QMAQEBATUtpjmPL4EsgnJuBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,185,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="62109889" Original-Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2010 20:33:36 +0200 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.2] (gaffa [172.20.199.2]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9266A7FA01A; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:33:35 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) In-Reply-To: <4BC206C0.2010202@alice.it> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123491 Archived-At: Angelo Graziosi skrev: > Indeed, now it builds :-) Great. > > Observations: I see that in Options | Show/Hide Tabs are on by default > (good!), but when I start Emacs I do not see any tabs. I still need 'M-x > tab-new' to see some tab. I would expect that, if Tabs are on by > default, starting Emacs shows desktop buffers in tabs, at least > compatibly with the starting 'geometry' of Emacs. > > So (sorry :( ), I still miss a short way to see desktop buffers in tabs. > Probably, you are only thinking how to implement that... > Yes. A generic window configuration can be complex, and saving an reading that into a file isn't that easy. Jan D.