From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.1.95 pretest; windows binaries Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:14:01 -0600 Message-ID: <4BBA98E9.2080808@gmail.com> References: <84mxxhkgc7.fsf@gmail.com> <4BBA7190.8070907@gmail.com> <4BBA8253.4050502@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270520065 7184 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2010 02:14:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:14:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 06 04:14:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyyJ4-0007Gr-Gq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:14:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NyyJ3-0004Rt-Tp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NyyIy-0004Ro-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40485 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NyyIw-0004Re-4U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyyIv-0008EK-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:14:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:63567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NyyIv-0008EG-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: by pwi2 with SMTP id 2so4122251pwi.0 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:14:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E1w2J2tn8zj9GWWu2Ix/ToMivmHeElIrvBiHhSTsb3M=; b=NYWmZ0lQ4ha4WmsOROcCUYkZm2NRqGToFYFIDpn8Ki8uf9PiwXjMYvhg9JhtDE/5DU jsaNNQeEw3XTUvm+G04XZzc7eao1QRptZQYkG7L43sQ7RNGlxiPFh1aFwQ6jiYsBzG6k FQ++bUsfQAlvVomYgwoUABPbpNT70+PFau3P8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YX6/QthddcSyHpvoVn0mMuLt6n4kD0q4XzPH9TwPr3gojiARILLsYemnuK9c6hVTQb XG5arNoegz/hgHkaqRA/oNT/GKJwoU35BTpv5yvBW0/X+20h00T5v1rWe5k6sGWOMQN8 cJGC1JQ0zlYXe//UtapDrkJ6CdmF4t9NcvVGg= Original-Received: by 10.141.2.21 with SMTP id e21mr4602527rvi.193.1270520051743; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.4] (67-40-151-224.hlrn.qwest.net [67.40.151.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm2316143pzk.7.2010.04.05.19.14.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:14:10 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4BBA8253.4050502@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123243 Archived-At: On 4/5/2010 6:37 PM, Jason Rumney wrote: > >> 2. Did you remember to execute 'make info' before packaging? The size >> of this current pretest differs by about 1.5 MB from the 23.1.94 and >> upon further investigation it turns out the info directory does not >> contain any of the files produced by makeinfo. > > The info files should have already been built in the source tarballs. > Hmm...true. The info files are indeed in the tarball. That's weird.