Re: Installing changes from branches

["Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

Stefan Monnier skrev 2010-04-03 16.08:
>> That is OK.  I didn't even know comments got merged like this.
>> Isn't the real problem that bzr requires a commit in the quickfix branch
>> after a merge?
>
> Bzr doesn't require any such thing.  You decided to commit, not bzr.

It is what the wiki-page says, I'm only following orders :-).
Anyway, I think bzr requires a commit before next merge.  Maybe there is some 
--force option to circumvent that.

> That's linked to the fact that you decided to use "merge" rather than
> "pull", i.e. use a separate branch.
>

I just decided to follow the instructions on the wiki page, pull isn't 
mentioned as an alternative there.

>> If you are doing some work that takes time, I find it easier to merge
>> from the trunk from time to time, rather than taking a big hit at
>> the end.
>
> There are many different ways to do it.  I suggested a few in the part
> of the message you elided:
> - "For such changes, it's a lot better to just take the diff from the
>    branch, apply to the trunk and commit".  That's what I do, as a matter
>    of fact, and I have grown to like it, since this "diff&patch" is
>    a good opportunity to rework/cleanup the patch one last time before
>    committing it.
> - "Or to use "bzr rebase" instead".
> - "Another very good solution is to not use quickfix branches at all, but
>    use shelves instead".

Rebase sounds good.  Doing diff and patch manually kind of feels like bzr is 
missing something.

>
>> Something like a collapsed merge would be good, i.e. merge from quickfix,
>> but only record it as a single commit.
>
> Indeed, you can also do that:
>
>    cd .../trunk
>    bzr merge .../quickfix
>    bzr revert --forget-merges
>    bzr commit ...
>
> that's virtually the same as "diff&patch": it forgets all about the
> branch's history.

But according to Óscar Fuentes you must later overwrite your quickfix branch 
with a pull --overwrite.  I assume you loose local history on the quickfix 
branch then?

It is all very confusing.

	Jan D.