From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:41:44 +0800 Message-ID: <4BB18F18.4060802@gnu.org> References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <831vf7ge57.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6hfeyzw.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdcig87f.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4sywpvv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83tys2fbxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbo1iubm.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <33744.130.55.118.19.1269906524.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269927774 20815 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2010 05:42:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eller.helmut@gmail.com, Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: herring@lanl.gov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 07:42:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwUDw-00032v-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:42:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwUDw-0002lR-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:42:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwUDk-0002ix-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36405 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwUDi-0002hO-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwUDi-0007DJ-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:60613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwUDf-0007Cg-UO; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so10583196iwn.26 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:42:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NNmvRIREywT2s8Gk3C5OdEHKD02HYqgDjiB6lmfrWmI=; b=xM+4f5n1HmPY/0bFhRY1EOo1+RHwKEY2Z0VQIuAHq6Z6afFP53i9zZdR+zGB2ywXiU a/oGIt7/NqYe2xX/56/LUqH/9J9/vTxHDttcR3P8gTX+JuzD4fqF75fHGyjcha3NlOxQ wdIqUA7BKWtd8gVtV8E9lZtQ10w0F5OHKO5kM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aleOeO3cGA3GTjmSX5jHnNZBtRPYMCzyZnzcqLY97bJZEOgO0adeSibbbkYo9RZ+cb Ru0MgGn5Bk45vOFk5fRzExrfF7nC5kvAJ4qe5o5Sj3fNp4u17KSal+SQgYiX7bR0Rrnp F27eAX8Ixnm42mlUoMTbJJttcgWNX5lorraVI= Original-Received: by 10.231.154.68 with SMTP id n4mr102397ibw.72.1269927750278; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:42:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [10.1.1.55] ([61.4.103.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm5082765ibr.9.2010.03.29.22.42.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:42:27 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 In-Reply-To: <33744.130.55.118.19.1269906524.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122898 Archived-At: On 30/03/2010 07:48, Davis Herring wrote: > Windows 95 could be installed with networking support but without ws2. > That may be the target audience here. > Indeed, but only in the 1995 - 1996 or 1997 timeframe, as it was added to a service pack, at the same time that the installer was changed to include networking support by default. That noone has complained about our change from winsock.dll to ws2.dll three years ago makes me suspect that such old versions of Windows 95 are not a problem we need to worry about. Windows 98 may still be in use, but that definitely comes with ws2 in all installations.