From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest, and branching plans Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:54:53 -0700 Message-ID: <4B9BA73D.3020203@gmail.com> References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <87ljemdzxo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B83682D.5010804@gnu.org> <4B9B0211.9070308@gmail.com> <837hpg3bxf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268498707 21781 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2010 16:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 17:45:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqUSJ-0007ov-Rj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:45:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqUS2-0005Ad-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:44:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqSk3-0008BT-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60116 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqSk2-0008Aa-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqSk1-0002Qo-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:62952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqSjy-0002QW-Tl; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:54:59 -0500 Original-Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so1532400pwj.0 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:54:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LhCC55KbSQkWj2zsFZuiU8toSxKxjOzNKffVmSKbnGE=; b=o8OWe24PhMUDrG5vILbwllQDeVaQAR+uqBINt0hURYZfPo4ZgIefffIHj/5fXCZNXz rTMME/CH7jIHvC8/ECpW0E0LJlvvuKxPCK3CQ63DiU1boHW8oTx9KSOj+WOG/1D3Lomg 3KgdT7sRAUMtVQKG53d3yYJkXcqgwktVl3kvU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xp0YZz/xucmoJX6HWB3DQ1pAH1y5R9HhoL4znrKSBUWQJo33FkiufcTHKuhYQgc7KB 04S7hxTlh6f3BxvPT/qo9I8O/dc9dO06rDAcRN1GXlO8AGzkRn+U3POdnDmhEDYI73sQ 6jUKV1RDKeEzUIcGTjyJCcVrPATBKs+o/HZvE= Original-Received: by 10.141.1.1 with SMTP id d1mr4172371rvi.134.1268492097576; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:54:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (67-41-153-183.hlrn.qwest.net [67.41.153.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm2819683pzk.6.2010.03.13.06.54.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:54:56 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 In-Reply-To: <837hpg3bxf.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:44:29 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121907 Archived-At: On 3/13/2010 12:42 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Would it make sense to create a 'make package-install' target that omits >> these things (if there is other stuff besides the shortcut, that is more >> intended for a real installation rather than packaging)? When I am >> packaging I don't want the shortcut created. >> > Patches are welcome. While at that, perhaps have that package-install > target run the admin/nt/makedist.bat automatically. > Sounds good, I will take a stab at that. Thanks, Christoph