From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Review: make-tarball.txt Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:26:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4B8C935D.9000200@gmail.com> References: <4B85EF43.3070002@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267551788 22266 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2010 17:43:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 18:43:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmW7a-0005UM-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:43:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60357 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmW7Z-0005cf-EJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmJgS-0007IQ-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42983 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmJgS-0007HT-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmJgR-0005wL-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f188.google.com ([209.85.222.188]:37606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmJgR-0005w8-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so792503pzk.18 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:26:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+zu7ZIWt00S5hxg8SEdYN95AUnw6ePIC1gt3Amj8+4=; b=aZTLhKDFHWFzdJ4gAy7dq3FmfsWrPN9pBiNZFyK0h1Bij7fyXeOcWQRJQsQ+tnrU6A hwOVd7oGD9fNgRamuV40hrUjuLbRA0LamR7YPc+KiC/h/bg21P/Q/OJQMPyC/iCVneee PGAS2X9c49DkxnWs6ZHI13SjO5UKaXshqJ1bw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bpr1afBMyse0R0O0Vwy3XB9Q1XNqFTH8GA0RcEscOp9B3HouWZvL3zEwwBu2UT3od0 6eMiuKVCShwomE4Gc/DnAXOwfFe6MF8CMsSH6PyfVAbPFcdKgkfc+7hN8C08RrFTm4UU AUMHE/JdLqPaPYTa5o1P+1u4j7gSJNaxM7OFI= Original-Received: by 10.141.188.9 with SMTP id q9mr2118925rvp.2.1267503969455; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:26:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.1.2? (67-41-156-83.hlrn.qwest.net [67.41.156.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm4298021pzk.2.2010.03.01.20.26.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:26:08 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100216 Thunderbird/3.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:42:56 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121556 Archived-At: On 2/25/2010 2:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Christoph writes: > >> + bzr tag EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE >> > There is no need for the base tag any more. > > >> + bzr branch -r tag:EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE ./ ../EMACS_`NUMBER'_RC >> > The branch should get a less shouting name, like emacs-$NUMBER. (The RC > suffix has always been a stupid convention.) > > Andreas Andreas, What would you propose? Just bzr branch ./ ../emacs-$NUMBER to cut the branch for release? Christoph