From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Roehler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:20:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4B86BF88.2090203@online.de> References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <87vddldyw9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267121945 8143 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 18:19:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:19:05 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 19:18:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkiIa-000234-GA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:18:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57948 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkiIZ-0000T7-Mn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:18:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkiIT-0000Sn-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33925 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkiIT-0000SC-51 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkiIS-0002Lb-9H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:52378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkiIR-0002LN-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:18:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.27] (p54BE983B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.190.152.59]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MfSEV-1O8g2P1yxf-00Oblq; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:18:46 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) In-Reply-To: <87vddldyw9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+pTuSqDcxeg5hBlG+TZ8flNf46WMrLF9j3JgS D0sOz+xJ+TmdppGg8lsqZBOJty7rXpOmKlFG54aN5T4vgwwpKz dXrjubz4YSe98c+s7BGXspso3NLEVrQYQVexAnkRH0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121369 Archived-At: Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > David Reitter writes: > > > What happens if somebody checked in code for which permission > > hasn't been obtained and can't be obtained? Suppose the > > copyright-holder requests removal. > > Then you think (and do) the unthinkable, of course. It would be very > good luck if that's all they want, though -- that scenario involves > much bigger problems. > > > > > > My emacs-w3m files show "either version 2, or (at your option) any later version." >From there it shouldn't arise any difficulty. It's just to update the version. Andreas